- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:37:12 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13479 --- Comment #5 from Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> 2011-07-31 20:37:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I disagree. If something is harmful, it should affect conformance > retroactively. I disagree. But to move forward. On assumption that registries in question will be reasonably managed it is very unlikely that such situation will ever appear. But it is bad in principle if conformance is depending on external resource which can constantly change and there is no trusted gatekeeper for this registry. So I still think that each published edition of HTML5 should either include snapshot of those registries or release relevant conformance criteria to allow any values. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 31 July 2011 20:37:14 UTC