- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 14:51:30 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13479 --- Comment #3 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2011-07-31 14:51:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > ... I agree with most Aryeh said. However, versioning registries may be tricky and overkill. Furthermore, registries aren't supposed to *remove* entries anyway -- at least not in the case of "we don't like this anymore". A simpler approach to deal with registries is not to make validity depend on them. It's fine to issue a warning for unregistered values, but it shouldn't be a conformance violation. Also note that having unstable conformance criteria should prevent the IESG from accepting the specification as a description of the text/html media type. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 31 July 2011 14:51:30 UTC