W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > July 2011

[Bug 13480] Add definition of "child nodes" term

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:01:06 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QnHak-0002oh-EY@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13480

Anne <annevk@opera.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |annevk@opera.com

--- Comment #1 from Anne <annevk@opera.com> 2011-07-30 22:01:05 UTC ---
I think they mean the same thing in HTML. It should probably just stick to
child. Where do you think "child" means "descendant"?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 30 July 2011 22:01:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:14 UTC