- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:58:26 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13409 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2011-07-29 14:58:26 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Using entity references in an XML document bearing a doctype whose public id is not on the list of special public ids currently listed in the spec wouldn't be compatible with deployed browsers. In other words, such content wouldn't Degrade Gracefully. The allegation that the list encourages the use of a non-conforming (for XHTML5) DTD is incorrect. DTDs are part of the XML syntax and, thus, are part of the syntax layer that XHTML5 is built on top of. Since XML doesn't provide an abstraction for specs layered on top of XML to place constraints on the XML layer, XHTML5 has no jurisdiction to place constraints on the XML layer (even though it suggests a particular entity resolver configuration). XHTML5 conformance requirement cannot restrict the use of a DTD, so any DTD is conforming for XHTML5. Thus, the spec isn't encouraging the use of DTDs that are non-conforming for XHTML5. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 July 2011 14:58:27 UTC