- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 18:48:05 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13345 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian@hixie.ch --- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-07-24 18:48:05 UTC --- I don't think this makes much sense. It renders as a block-level widget. <details> is completely inappropriate for inline rationale. It's not a footnote element. It's specifically and exclusively intended to be a disclosure triangle widget. If we want a footnote element then we should add a footnote element. <details> is intended to be essentially be parallel to <fieldset>, the difference being that the group can be collapsed if it's a <details> element. (As a side-note, I believe this would be the first time we'd be allowing <p>s to be nested. I think keeping the language consistent in that you can never nest <p>s is a good thing.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 24 July 2011 18:48:07 UTC