- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:29:15 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12561 --- Comment #24 from Luke Plant <L.Plant.98@cantab.net> 2011-07-21 23:29:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) > I don't think we're realistically going to make extra markup valid just to > support the use-case of pages that want to validate as XHTML 1.x as well as > HTML5. I think that is a fair point. I might add that this isn't a case of making 'extra' markup valid - rather, it seems that is the HTML5 spec that has gone to extra lengths to define a perfectly sensible combination of markup as *invalid*. However, I don't consider this the main argument against the current spec, just an additional nuisance. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 23:29:16 UTC