- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:54:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13305 Summary: WG Decisions Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: working group Decision Policy AssignedTo: mjs@apple.com ReportedBy: Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org A WG decision about an Issue can be made in several ways as per the Decision Policy. See the Escalation Process at http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v2.html#escalation For example, a WG decision can be made after a survey is taken and the results evaluated by the WG Chairs. See "6. Poll or Vote " of the Escalation Process. In addition, a WG decision can be made by "amicable resolution" if no one objects to a Call for Consensus for a single change proposal. See "0. Amicable Resolution" of the Escation Process. All of these WG decisions should be FINAL and subject only to reconsideration if the Issue is re-opened with "new information" as per the W3C Process. Some Working Group members appear to think that these WG Decision can simply be reconsidered by saying that they missed the Call for Consensus or were not paying attention. The Decision Policy should clearly state that these WG Decisions are final and will only be reconsidered in the face of "new information" as per the W3C Process. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 21:54:29 UTC