W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > July 2011

[Bug 13267] sandboxing implication for plugins should be rephrased

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:02:41 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Qhoav-0002lw-4t@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13267

--- Comment #2 from Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> 2011-07-15 20:02:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Specifically, it would make the most sense to remove "plugins are disabled",
> and add a sentence saying that the UA has to only allow plugins to run if it
> knows they'll meet these requirements.  E.g., NPAPI might be extended to have
> flags to signal this sort of thing, or maybe the browsers authors control the
> plugin themselves (like the Chrome PDF viewer).

+1

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 20:02:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:13 UTC