- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 20:01:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9350 Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #16 from Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3cbug@gmail.com> 2011-07-06 20:01:32 UTC --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Partially Accepted Change Description: see comment 4 Rationale: Re-resolving as fixed. * There is existing browser support of some form in all browsers, which means we have to spec it and implementers have to implement it, unless you can get major implementers to drop support. * Once a feature has to be implemented anyway, the threshold for making it valid is low. If this were a new feature request, it would be rejected, but we prefer to make existing features valid unless there are relatively good reasons against. That minimizes useless validator noise and encourages authors to use validators more. * There are some use-cases for <wbr>. They aren't very strong, but given that we're stuck with it anyway, they're strong enough to make it valid. * The fact that existing browsers implement <wbr> inconsistently and authors are confused about it is not a strong argument against making it valid. Both of those things are true about many preexisting web features. Either we have to drop support entirely, or specify it and get browsers to converge, regardless of validity. I recommend that you do not continue to reopen bugs on this issue. You have two viable options: 1) File bugs against browsers and try to get them to agree to drop <wbr> support entirely. If implementers are willing to drop support, we can remove the element entirely, which is a win for simplicity of the platform. I suspect it's widely enough used that you won't be able to convince them, though. 2) Follow the instructions in the boilerplate at the top of this comment to escalate to an issue: "add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the Tracker Issue". -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 20:01:39 UTC