W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > January 2011

[Bug 11798] It has been brought to my attention by some browser vendors that browsers don't actually implement accessibility API annotations exactly the way the ARIA spec says to; instead, they have default mappings from HTML directly to the accessibility APIs that t

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:08:30 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PgYWM-0001QG-S1@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11798

--- Comment #7 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2011-01-22 08:08:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > i am sure it does, when can we expect some elaboration of your thinking?
> 
> I'm not sure there's anything to elaborate on beyond what comment 0 says.

"some browser vendors that browsers
don't actually implement accessibility API annotations exactly the way the
ARIA spec says to"

how do they differ?

"This probably affects ISSUE-129"

how?

"So it might make sense to change this section so that it is nothing but
conformance criteria for authors, removing the UA conformance criteria
relating to ARIA and platform AAPIs from the HTML spec altogether."

how will this materially affect the current spec text?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 22 January 2011 08:08:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 22 January 2011 08:08:40 GMT