W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > January 2011

[Bug 9657] Content model of object

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 02:38:11 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PgTMh-0006QM-JS@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9657

Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |TrackerRequest
             Status|VERIFIED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

--- Comment #12 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2011-01-22 02:38:10 UTC ---
Adding TrackerRequest.  This change TrackerRequest also relates to Bug 9428.

Suggested title and text for the issue tracker:

TITLE: HTML4's content-model for <object> should continue

TEXT: 

In XHTML1 and HTML4, the <object> element creates a new context, where the
parent element is ignored when the content of object is validated.

This permits such constructs such as 

   <p>Paragraph 1 
         <object><p>Seemingly nested paragraph</p></object>
          Still paragraph 1</p>

In fact, the solution text to ISSUE-107 resulted that the editor inserted
exactly such an example into the specification.
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-iframe-element.html#the-param-element 

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/107

The change proposal for ISSUE-128 also identifies a compatibility-need for
using <object> to avoid that <p> is autoclosed by <figure> in some parsers.

http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/FigureInP

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 22 January 2011 02:38:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 22 January 2011 02:38:25 GMT