W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > January 2011

[Bug 11752] With the itemscope - it seems unnecessary since it becomes redundant whenever there's an itemtype - so why not have itemtype="item"

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:49:25 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Pdnm9-0002FQ-CU@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11752

Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jackalmage@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> 2011-01-14 17:49:24 UTC ---
The HTML spec editor did user-testing of the feature earlier, and if I recall
correctly, several of the test subjects found it much easier if there was an
explicit indicator of the container, rather than it being implicit due to the
type.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 14 January 2011 17:49:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 14 January 2011 17:49:31 GMT