- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:16:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11557 --- Comment #15 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2011-01-13 10:16:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Comment 11 suggests that it's acceptable for a site with only a few AT users to > not be accessible to those AT users, which seems counter to what I normally > hear from the accessibility community. > > On balance it seems that the issue raised in comment 10 is largely academic and > completely outweighed by the issue raised in comment 0, comment 1, and comment > 3, and no other use cases have been raised (despite comment 4 saying there are > "many legitimate use cases"). However, I could see an argument being made for > the position in comment 10. I don't see any argument for the status quo. > > Could someone from the a11ytf clarify the tf's position on comment 10? > despite comment 4 saying there are "many legitimate use cases" as implemented in any case where an author wishes make use of a state or property that is particular to a role example: aria-pressed on the button role the role needs to be explicitly added. <input type=button role='button" aria-pressed=true> -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 10:16:22 UTC