- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:40:46 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11386
--- Comment #12 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2011-01-11 18:40:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > (In reply to comment #9)
> > > This should be defined in HTML, in the UA stylesheet. It's perfectly fine to
> > > have styles for <video> and <img> be different there.
> >
> > Precisely, this was my thinking too. So it's not out of scope for HTML, then?
>
> Ah, talking past each other. I meant that it was out-of-scope for HTML to
> define the rendering itself, since CSS can now handle it. It's perfectly
> appropriate (and necessary) for HTML to define *what* CSS is used to handle it.
Yep, this is what I'm suggesting: that we put something like this in the user
agent style sheet:
video { object-fit: contain; object-position: 50% 50% }
img { object-fit: fill }
(And like any default style it can be hardcoded, so it doesn't necessarily
require browsers to support object-fit and object-position via CSS, although
that would be nice.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 18:40:47 UTC