W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > January 2011

[Bug 11448] Why is the second example not <kbd><samp>File</samp> | <samp>Eat Apple...</samp></kbd>?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:44:47 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PcRPr-00030v-Le@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11448

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |ian@hixie.ch
         Resolution|                            |NEEDSINFO

--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-01-10 23:44:47 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Did Not Understand Request
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: That would be acceptable too  it's a middle ground between the two
extremes given in the example in the spec. The spec explains what
samp-in-kbd-in-kbd means, though, no?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 10 January 2011 23:44:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 January 2011 23:44:49 GMT