- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 03:44:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10828 --- Comment #42 from CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com> 2011-01-09 03:44:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #41) Hi, will there be a way for a br element to still sometimes constitute a bidi-paragraph break, although no longer by default? Thanks. Best, --C. E. Whitehead cewcathar@hotmail.com > (In reply to comment #40) > > I'm confused as to why this bug is reopened. The original bug is fixed, no? Is > > it reopened to revert the fix so that instead of being compatible with IE and > > WebKit, we go back to being compatible with IE and Firefox? > From what I understood, the original bug said "please change what HTML4 says > should happen as it is incompatible with both what implementations do and what > happens in real life". > What Aharon is saying is that he was wrong about the first half of the > statement. Upon a re-check, current implementations do follow HTML4 when > working in 'standards' mode. This means, to me, that we should avoid causing > previously standard compliant behavior to suddenly become non-standard. > In other words, I believe this bug should, under these changed circumstances, > be marked "Invalid", and its solution reverted. > I should point out that, as far as I know, Aharon does not share this belief. > He thinks that the bug should still be fixed (i.e., the situation should remain > as it is), but he was honest enough to state that with the different state of > affairs, the discussion should be re-opened. > Shachar -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 9 January 2011 03:44:35 UTC