- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 20:24:49 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12148 --- Comment #4 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> 2011-02-21 20:24:48 UTC --- > I'd love it if someone could find some real world examples I would too; the burden of proof in this case is on those proposing backwards-incompatible changes, imo. > why on earth they'd do something like disabled="false" to mean disabled=true. You're assuming HTML authors necessarily "mean" something when they write some HTML, as opposed to trial-and-error or cargo-cult copy-paste or a bug in some CGI. This is a bad assumption, sadly. > I don't see why some evangelism to those sites couldn't address the problem. Evangelism is not free. Are you volunteering to contact all the sites involved, however many are discovered, and get them to change what they're doing? Or is this a case of "it should be really easy for someone else to do this"? > is going to boil down to oops rather than intention. It doesn't matter whether it's intention or not, as long as there's enough of it. Again, data would be good. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 21 February 2011 20:24:50 UTC