- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:49:46 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12072 --- Comment #22 from Daniel.S <crazy-daniel@gmx.de> 2011-02-19 17:49:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > In contrast, the most *typical* use of X-UA-COMPATIBLE would probably be the > opposite: rather that differentiation, make all versions of IE behave as IE7, > for instance. In my experience that's the typical use case, yes. > That said: a content-model-restriction in HTML5 wouldn't hinder you from, > validly, using this trick in HTML4 and XHTML1. I want to use HTML5 and be valid. I also want my website to work across browsers, though. So I think that people will more likely ignore the restriction HTML5 puts on meta elements than using an Conditional Comment with a meta element before the doctype. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 19 February 2011 17:49:47 UTC