W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2011

[Bug 11711] What about sandboxed XHTML ?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 01:51:34 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Pmcju-0006NQ-Fj@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11711

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |ian@hixie.ch
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-02-08 01:51:34 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: There's nothing special about XHTML, it just uses the XML toolchain.
So I'll leave this to the XML community to specify if they want it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 01:51:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 February 2011 01:53:52 GMT