W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2011

[Bug 11368] Missing Typographic Convention - Switch Construct

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:41:03 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Pl475-0004wH-1w@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11368

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #3 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-02-03 18:41:02 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change
Rationale: I don't really understand what that would mean. It's not really
meant to be interpreted any particular way, it's just supposed to be modestly
decorative. Each time the "switch" construct is used, it is explicitly
explained (unless I've missed a case).

If you disagree, it would help to see what kind of explanation you think would
actually improve the readability of the spec.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:41:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:41:04 GMT