[Bug 10824] New: i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and position

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10824

           Summary: i18n comment 20 : list item marker display and
                    position
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org, public-i18n-bidi@w3.org


Comment from the i18n review of:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/

Comment 20
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/html5-bidi/
Editorial/substantive: S
Tracked by: AL

Location in reviewed document:
undefined [http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/spec.html#contents]

Comment:This is a part of the proposals made by the "Additional Requirements
for Bidi in HTML" W3C First Public Working Draft. For a full description of the
use cases, please see 
http://www.w3.org/International/docs/html-bidi-requirements/#lists
[http://www.w3.org/International/docs/html-bidi-requirements/#lists]
. Here is the proposal made there:

The HTML specification should state that, by default, the markers of all
"list-style-position:outside" items should disregard the list item element's
computed direction, using the list element's computed direction instead for the
marker's display and positioning.

CSS will provide means to control this. If the CSS default in this respect must
differ, the default stylesheet should achieve the default behavior specified
above.

Furthermore, the list marker text will be directionally isolated from the list
item text, appearing in its own UBA paragraph.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 13:01:11 UTC