- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:43:54 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10113
Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #2 from Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> 2010-09-28 22:43:54 UTC ---
The discussion that was behind this bug was:
# [21:44] <zcorpan_> Hixie: btw why can't </rt> be omitted?
# [21:46] <Hixie> in the syntax or in the parser?
# [21:47] <zcorpan_> both
# [21:47] <Hixie> didn't really think about it
# [21:48] <Hixie> just seemed simpler this way
# [21:48] <Hixie> i guess if people want we can make it optional
# [21:49] <zcorpan_> i saw subtitles with seemingly deliberatly omitting </i>
by just looking at a handful
# [21:49] <zcorpan_> doesn't seem like a stretch that people are going to omit
</rt> especially since it's optional in html
# [21:49] <Hixie> yeah seems reasonable
# [21:49] <Hixie> file a bug and i'll look into it
http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20100708#l-792
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 22:43:56 UTC