- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:03:20 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11168 Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shelleyp@burningbird.net --- Comment #3 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2010-10-31 17:03:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I object. Removing references to the WhatWG only serves political purposes, and > > amounts to belittling the reader. > > So removing them serves political purposes, but adding them does not? Yes, I wondered at that. Politics aside, this is the W3C version of the document. By including parallel references, we're not only adding redundancy, and not particularly helpful redundancy, we're generating a level of confusion about where what is the definitive W3C material. And, the W3C has no control over what happens to the WhatWG servers. Or content. That's not necessarily a problem with a ack section link, but it is when you have references to material such as a FAQ, which supposedly is supposed to answer questions about the W3C document; or to source code control, which contains material that isn't the same as the W3C material. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 31 October 2010 17:03:22 UTC