W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > October 2010

[Bug 11064] unstated requirement to be valid.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 21:25:56 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PBwSS-00022J-9d@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11064

David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|NEEDSINFO                   |

--- Comment #8 from David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> 2010-10-29 21:25:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)

> 
> Please provide further info about how you’d like this changed.
> 
> I appreciate your feedback,
> 
> Eliot

I have given some explict suggestions in earlier comments.

I believe that the document should say explicitly that it is documenting
_extra_ constraints that must be satisfied by a document that is well formed
XML and valid HTML5  in order that compatible DOM are generated by an XML or
HTML5 parser.

then the document should restrict itself to those extra constraints and remove
all sections that only describe requirements of being xml well formed.

An alternative, as described in the original comment would be to assume the
document is both valid as html5 and valid to some xml schema, in which case the
majority of the document could be removed.

(I could understand a "needsinfo" classification, but clearly the issue isn't
resolved, so I re-opened.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 21:25:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:00 UTC