- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:53:18 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11169 Summary: HTML+RDFa - Infer @content from @datetime on time tag Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny) AssignedTo: msporny@digitalbazaar.com ReportedBy: waters.boyd@gmail.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, msporny@digitalbazaar.com Consider this markup: <body prefix="dc: http://purl.org/dc/terms/"> <time datetime="2010-10-29T15:48:11" property="dc:modified" pubdate>October 29th 2010 at 11:48 AM</time> <time datetime="2010-10-29T15:36:24" property="dc:created">October 29th 2010 at 11:36 AM</time> </body> I would like the @content attribute to be inferred from the time's @datetime. In the spec right now it seems that the @content attribute will get the text contents of the time tag, in this case "October 29th 2010 at 11:48 AM". Which is invalid. Or perhaps the markup is invalid, because the @content is missing. But it SHOULD be an error to say something like <time datetime="2010-10-29T15:48:11" property="dc:modified" content="2007-01-01"> That's valid markup -- it's possible to set @content to any valid W3 date value -- but what are the semantics? (I have not participated in semantic web activity in about 7 years, and my specification-reading skills have blown away. So perhaps the current draft HTML+RDFa spec already has this. But I don't think so.) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 29 October 2010 17:53:21 UTC