- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:23:57 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11064 --- Comment #6 from David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> 2010-10-18 11:23:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) yes but which requirements? > > All the document conformance requirements. That is, all the normative > statements about document or authors. OK so if the polyglot spec aims to say, given a conformant html5 document, what further constraints the document must satisfy in order to get a compatible DOM if parsed as XML then a) it needs to say that, and b)it needs to add extra constraints to explain why http://monet.nag.co.uk/~dpc/poly/t1.html does not produce the same DOM from an html5 and XML parser. As far as I can see it is conformant html5 (validator.nu agrees) and it appears to meet all the constraints in this spec, but you don't get an XML DOM as t1.html isn't well formed as XML. If the intention is that the constraints only apply to conformant html5 documents that are well formed XML then a) the polyglot spec should say that, and b) if it did say that, then many of the constraints that are currently specified (such as quoting attribute values, and using uppercase <!DOCTYPE) are redundant. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 11:23:59 UTC