- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:40:37 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10462
Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cyns@microsoft.com
--- Comment #5 from Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com> 2010-10-13 20:40:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
> satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
> you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
> reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
> Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
> title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
> yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
>
> Status: Rejected
> Change Description: no spec change
> Rationale: Ah, I see. That list is non-normative intentionally — it's
> actually inaccurate, and would have to be dramatically complicated to be made
> perfectly accurate (as would be needed to put it into a normative table). This
> is because the normative requirements have subtle complexities like referring
> to elements that define commands, as opposed to referring only to elements by
> element name.
>
> Also, I think having the "no restriction" elements in the table would make the
> table much more difficult to read.
Ian,
Can you explain why you think this would be more difficult to read? It seems
to me that being able to look up what is allowed on any element, by finding the
element in an alphabetical list, would be much easier to read and use.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2010 20:40:39 UTC