- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:55:08 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10720 --- Comment #8 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2010-10-12 18:55:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > As best I can discern, this seems to be covered by ISSUE-41: > > > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41 > > Well, not really. > > If the accepted change proposal for Issue 41 is the zero-change, then this bug > asks that the section be returned to what it once was. > > If another change proposal is accepted, then this section is changed, anyway. > > Now, the editor can revert the changes now, and that would satisfy the bug > regardless of what happens with Issue 41. What happened is the situation was complicated when the editor made changes to the extensibility section without proposing the changes as an Issue 41 change proposal, and without waiting for Issue 41 to be resolved. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:55:12 UTC