- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:40:36 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11004 --- Comment #4 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2010-10-10 16:40:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > These remarks seem fairly off-topic for this bug, which is solely about > providing an example rendering. > > > We also need to ensure a mapping between the actual range value and the > > datalist option label. Currently, the list/datalist is seen as more of a > > passive visual aid, then an actual concrete mapping. > > As far as I can tell, the "value" attribute concretely maps the suggestion > label to its numeric value. > > If this is somehow not sufficient, please file a separate bug explaining the > problem. > > > In addition, we would need an ARIA mapping associated with the labeling, in > > such a way that actual step values would be available via API with the tick > > marks, but the step value AND label being available when a label is specified. > > The requirement for accessibility mappings in the mappings Note is already > logged as Bug 11003. > > ARIA does not cover all semantics that need to be mapped to accessibility APIs > (at the moment, for instance, it doesn't even cover tables). I don't think ARIA > has any particularly obvious mapping for range control suggestion labels. > Notably the JQuery UI slider doesn't seem to add ARIA annotations to the tick > mark labels. > > If you think there is a good way to map the native semantics to ARIA as it > stands, please explain how in dedicated bug. Otherwise, please propose > additions to ARIA to PFWG via the public-pfwg-comments mailing list. Sorry, had missed your reference to bug 11003 earlier. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 10 October 2010 16:40:38 UTC