- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:13:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10833 --- Comment #4 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> 2010-10-07 22:13:29 UTC --- To be clear, I definitely think that <form> <input type=checkbox name=a required> <input type=checkbox name=b required> <!-- Note, different name --> </form> Should be allowed and should require that *both* checkboxes are checked. It was unclear to me if you agreed with that or not Maciej? What I interpreted the scope of this bug to was if the following markup required only one of the boxes to be checked, or if both had to be checked: <form> <input type=checkbox name=a required> <input type=checkbox name=a required> <!-- Note, same name --> </form> There is also the complication of what to do with markup like: <form> <input type=checkbox name=a required> <input type=checkbox name=a> <!-- Note, required missing --> </form> This complication is the main reason I'm hesitant to treat the boxes as a group. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 October 2010 22:13:31 UTC