W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > October 2010

[Bug 10635] I could be reading the spec wrong, but are the default flow behaviors for these elements undefined? Will an article be rendered as a block-level element, or have no effect on flow at all? I've found several top-teir web-dev ref sites which all have differ

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 20:29:18 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1P2VBO-0000bt-9a@jessica.w3.org>

Tony <wyrdnexus@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
         Resolution|NEEDSINFO                   |FIXED

--- Comment #8 from Tony <wyrdnexus@gmail.com> 2010-10-03 20:29:15 UTC ---
That's the first place I looked. It is kindof defined there. But the whole
flow-control section is entirely ambiguous. This probably is an issue for there
instead of here.

Marked as resolved.

However, intentionally creating ambiguous rendering guidelines is NOT a good
idea in my opinion.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 3 October 2010 20:29:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:30:58 UTC