W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2010

[Bug 11254] Say outright that <b>, <i>, <s>, <sup>, <sub>, <br>, and maybe others are typographical and not semantic

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:52:00 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PFT4i-0000Ov-Ou@jessica.w3.org>

Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |hsivonen@iki.fi

--- Comment #1 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2010-11-08 14:52:00 UTC ---
>From f2f minutes:
> kennyluck: I found the interpretation of <i> as a semantic element hard to 
> understand. The table says the <i> element is for alternative voice, but the 
> text says...
> ... I don't think technical terms fit into this category; do you alternate 
> your voice when you read a ??? name.
> hsivonen: The reason it's complicated is that it tries to provide a semantic 
> fig leaf to justify keeping <i>.

I agree that the spec should say that <b>, <i>, <u>, <s>, <sup>, <sub>, <br>
mean certain typographic effects in the visual media.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 14:52:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:01 UTC