- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:31:16 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10808 --- Comment #33 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-11-04 07:31:16 UTC --- I really don't think that giving authors the ability to pick an algorithm is the way to go. I barely understand this stuff, and I've spent part of my career writing bidi algorithm test cases; expecting authors to be able to legitimately pick the best algorithm is just hopelessly optimistic, IMHO. If there's an algorithm better than what the bidi spec says, then let's use that. But let's not introduce options that authors won't understand. The few authors who really want a better algorithm can always implement it themselves, after all. I just reread this whole bug, and one thing that I can't help but wonder is whether any solution here will really work reliably enough to be considered a success. Shouldn't we just require any content developer who works with bidi text to keep track of the direction of any of the text they want to output? The browser isn't going to be in any better a position to guess the direction than the site is, and often in fact will be in a far worse position. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 07:31:18 UTC