- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 13:18:25 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9767 --- Comment #3 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2010-05-20 13:18:24 --- (In reply to comment #2) > That sounds like a possible solution. Though I think I'd like to wait a bit > longer before making changes to the spec until we see that it's really > necessary. So far we've just heard of two sites breaking. Ignoring document.write() coming from a <script src> completing fetch when the insertion point is undefined would mitigate 4 out of the total 6 open HTML5 parser evang bugs: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542104 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553795 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565938 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527635 (Additionally, there was the case of content-injecting [ad injecting?] router-based MITM malware.) That is, the result wouldn't be what the site meant but the effect on the user would be missing out on some ads instead of getting a blank page. (The 2 other HTML5 parser evang bugs are https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540480 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565689 ) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 13:18:29 UTC