- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 22:21:36 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9729 Summary: Straw poll method hides or discourages gathering essential information Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: working group Decision Policy AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: lmm@acm.org QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mjs@apple.com, Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com, rubys@intertwingly.net, mike@w3.org When reviewing the results of a straw poll, it's often essential, when assessing the state of agreement, to know the difference between: a) They care a lot but their opinion has already been expressed better than they think they can b) they really don't care c) They think they might care but haven't had time to decide d) They're not really following the working group The current survey methodology doesn't allow an observer to distinguish between these states -- in all of these cases, people are discouraged from expressing any opinion at all. I think everyone who isn't (d) should respond to the sraw polls, even if to say (a) or (b) or (c). As long as the responses are brief, there shouldn't be any downside to gathering more information from everyone. Right now the chairs are telling people if they respond with (a) (b) or (c) that their answer will be IGNORED, which doesn't actually make sense because the results are public and they may or may not be IGNORED by the chairs. This information should also help the chairs be more neutral in deciding whether they think an argument is "strong", because it allows individuals to indicate in situation (a) how much they agree or disagree. This would be much better than relying on the chair(s) to decide whether they personally think an argument is "strong", because of course, different people are moved by different kinds of arguments, agree or disagree with assumptions, etc. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 13 May 2010 22:21:38 UTC