- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 16:19:07 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7918 --- Comment #12 from Nick Levinson <Nick_Levinson@yahoo.com> 2010-05-12 16:19:06 --- I support reopening. Thanks. Universalizing from X-Moz might be good. One concern, but maybe I misunderstand something: If X-Moz results in the TCP connection being closed and Google says to send a 404 error for X-Moz, does that interfere with fetching when the time comes for a timely fetch of the same file that denied prefetch? And does sending a 404 error interfere with viewing the current page? I'm unclear why a 404 error is supposed to be helpful to the visitor for a prefetch denial if fetching will proceed. Prefetch denial could be stated in a status bar, if that's helpful and wouldn't interfere with current-page viewing or timely fetching. I'm happy with any solution that works. If there's a better way than a use.txt file, great. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 16:19:08 UTC