- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 16:28:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9284 --- Comment #5 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> 2010-05-06 16:28:34 --- I agree with Henri's suggestion about letting other people than the editor resolve bugs as WORKSFORME. I also agree that it might be useful to have a variant of the editor's response boilerplate/template for this case, but I don't think it's absolutely necessary. Other than that, I think the proposed description of the INVALID state might be too restrictive. I think in practice we are not just using it for bugs that are obvious junk or spam, but also for bugs that are raised legitimately but which are clearly based on the commenter having misread/misunderstood the spec. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:28:36 UTC