- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 04:18:12 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #50 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> 2010-05-03 04:18:10 --- EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected removal of CURIEs from RDFa Core 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1 Change Description: Changes have been made in RDFa Core 1.1 and HTML+RDFa 1.1 to enable CURIE-less usage of RDFa. Full-IRIs in RDFa attributes: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core/#s_curieprocessing and RDFa Profiles: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core/#s_profiles are two of the mechanisms now available in RDFa Core 1.1 that don't require the use of CURIEs. Rationale: Removal of CURIEs from RDFa Core 1.1 is not something that the RDFa WG is willing to do, especially since there is broad deployment for CURIEs at the moment. If you wish to pursue this further, please raise this as an ISSUE in the HTML WG. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 04:18:13 UTC