[Bug 8978] Document conformance requirements does not state that extensions to HTML5 syntax are allowed

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8978


Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




--- Comment #2 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>  2010-05-03 01:25:43 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Fixed

Change Description: 

Added the following bullet item to the list of conformance criteria:

"All Extensions to the HTML5 Syntax, as described in this document, must be
considered valid and conforming in a HTML+RDFa 1.1 document."

http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/#document-conformance

Rationale:

There is no harm in making it crystal clear that the HTML5 syntax extensions in
the document should be considered conforming.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 3 May 2010 01:25:45 UTC