http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670 --- Comment #47 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-03-31 18:44:19 --- > Would any version of RDFa that uses xmlns: be acceptable to you? I don't know what you mean by "xmlns:" here. If you mean in the same way that HTML5 currently "uses" xmlns, namely as a set of optional attributes with fixed values that have no effect on the processing model, then yes, that would be fine. > Also, could you answer this question: > > Would any version of RDFa that uses a prefixes that can be bound to arbitrary > URLs then combined with other strings to form a URL be acceptable to you. I'm not aware of any proposal that does the above that I consider simple enough for broad Web deployment, but that doesn't mean one doesn't exist. I do not wish to be obtuse; nor is this bug intended to be an obstinate roadblock. I truly am open to other ideas, I just think that, as described in the original bug description and in comment 44, the current mechanism is too complicated. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2010 18:44:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 31 March 2010 18:44:28 GMT