- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:52:14 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7670 --- Comment #46 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> 2010-03-31 15:52:13 --- (In reply to comment #45) > Would any version of RDFa that uses xmlns: be acceptable to you? Ian, I need a response on this - would any version of RDFa that uses xmlns: be acceptable to you? Also, could you answer this question: Would any version of RDFa that uses a prefixes that can be bound to arbitrary URLs then combined with other strings to form a URL be acceptable to you. I believe that this is still your position, but would like to hear it again from you (because your position may have changed since this bug was created). -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:52:15 UTC