W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 8784] politics in <param> example

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:42:34 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NwSLa-0005SW-Ol@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8784





--- Comment #11 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  2010-03-30 03:42:34 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> 
> The specific concern was:
> 
> "A *typical* example would have fallback content with instructions where to
> find
> the plugin. Also, changing this not to mention a *specific* plugin probably
> would be good as well."
> 

It's incorrect process to both reopen the bug *and* request escalation. Please
pick one of the following:

1) Reopen bug for fresh consideration by the editor - you will get a full
Editor's Response with rationale and a spec diff link if any spec changes are
made.

2) Escalate to tracker for consideration by the full Working Group - a Change
Proposal will be required.

In case of (1), the TrackerRequest keyword should be removed for now (you will
still be entitled to request escalation once the editor replies again).

In case of (2), the bug should be moved back to VERIFIED - it will remain there
and will not be closed pending a Working Group Decision.

If you do not pick one of these in a couple of days, we will assume option 2.

(Note to Julian: since you provided a very specific description of the
remaining problem, and proposed a solution, I suggest treating this as reopened
at first to give the editor another crack at it. If you would like, I can
request higher priority to avoid creating unnecessary delay. But the choice is
yours.)


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 03:42:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 30 March 2010 03:42:36 GMT