W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 8893] Clarify how Change Proposals get reviewed and what happens to Change Proposals that do not meet requirements

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:27:33 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NuefN-0007ET-Vj@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8893





--- Comment #2 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  2010-03-25 04:27:33 ---
Hi Larry, the thing that is "formal" about them is that the chairs don't try to
judge the goodness of the change or the quality of the rationale. Merely that
all the required components are present, and that some sort of plausible
rationale is provided actually argues for each aspect of the proposal. In other
words, we are not judging the full merits of the proposal, only that it meets
the minimum bar to be taken up and reviewed by the WG.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 25 March 2010 04:27:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 25 March 2010 04:27:41 GMT