- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:28:45 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9214
steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |faulkner.steve@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-03-24 02:28:44 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I don't understand why we would make:
> <img role="presentation" src="img">
> ...valid (and implying alt=""), when we already have:
> <img alt="" src="img">
> ...which is valid, means the same thing, and implies role="presentation". What
> is the benefit?
a point to consider:
role="presentation" on <img> means the browser removes the <img> from
the accessible tree
alt="" is not removed by the browser, its left up to the assistive
tech to remove it from what it presents to the user.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:28:47 UTC