- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:50:29 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9287 Summary: DOCTYPE "mostly useless" Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#the-doctype OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HTML5 spec bugs AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: tj@crowdersoftware.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org In Section 8.1.1[1], the current published specification says: > A DOCTYPE is a mostly useless, but required, header. It then goes on to say: > DOCTYPEs are required for legacy reasons. When omitted, browsers tend to use a different rendering mode that is incompatible with some specifications. So, not useless then, or even mostly useless, as it's required to ensure that the most common UAs in the world (web browsers) behave something close to properly. Perhaps consider dropping the "mostly useless" comment to avoid encouraging skimmers to drop it. Perhaps "A DOCTYPE is a required header that primarily serves a legacy, but significant, purpose." (Separately: It's a header? That seems an odd term for it.) [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/syntax.html#the-doctype -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2010 13:50:30 UTC