W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 9268] Why can’t we just reuse the <caption> element and describe its meaning according to context? (i.e., spec gives directions for “caption in table” and “caption in figure” contexts.) Semantically, both fulfill the same purpose. And even if there

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:17:46 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NsMA6-0005Rb-Qk@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9268


Ms2ger <Ms2ger@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |Ms2ger@gmail.com
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




--- Comment #1 from Ms2ger <Ms2ger@gmail.com>  2010-03-18 20:17:46 ---
Legacy parsing constraints. It would be impossible to use the figure element
inside a table.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 20:17:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 18 March 2010 20:17:54 GMT