- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:39:21 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7056 --- Comment #17 from James Graham <jgraham@opera.com> 2010-03-15 12:39:20 --- The rationale was basically that only allowing phrasing content in captions is an arbitrary restriction that has no obvious benefits. There are also use cases for allowing flow content children; for example scientific papers often have tables with rather long captions that provide detail about the interpretation of data in the table. Such captions benefit from additional structure enabled by allowing flow content in captions. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 15 March 2010 12:39:23 UTC