- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:52:52 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7546
Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mjs@apple.com
--- Comment #11 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> 2010-03-15 06:52:51 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
>
> > This bug is now being moved to VERIFIED....[snip]...it may be
> > marked as NoReply .
>
> I stand by the conclusion I reached in Comment #8 above.
>
> As such, and in accordance with your new Working Group Decision Policy,
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html
>
> it seems best to choose the NoRepy option. I believe HTML 5 is barking up the
> wrong tree, but based on my experience so far, I don't think escalating these
> ideas within the HTML 5 Group will bring any changes; these will have to come
> at the TAG level or by the response of the Internet itself during attempted
> implementation, or via HTML 5 being superseded by CCN or a similar structural
> change.
>
Since you're here and available to reply: If your position is that you do not
wish to pursue the issue further, but wish to register your disagreement for
the record, then the best thing to do would be to put the bug in CLOSED and add
the Disagree keyword. NoReply is intended for cases where the originator of a
comment is not available to respond in a timely manner. We'll use it if we have
to, but a proper reply is preferred, even if it is one of disagreement.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 15 March 2010 06:52:56 UTC