W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 8835] Clarifcation of the purpose of "Markup" spec and possible renaming of it.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:20:56 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NpGDw-0007zT-RM@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8835


Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #3 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>  2010-03-10 07:20:56 ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no change
Rationale: I changed the name of this document once previously, quite some time
back, and was subsequently asked to change it back. I agree that the name is
not ideal, but then I also think the names of many specs are less than ideal --
and I don't think the name of this particular one is any worse than any of the
possible alternatives. And if I were to change it, I am certain there'd be
another bug raised to propose changing it back. So rather than spend more time
yo-yo-ing around with that, I would prefer that we go with the status quo and
move on.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 07:20:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 March 2010 07:21:00 GMT