W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 6505] should h:tml draft describe for authors how relative URLs are resolved?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:02:13 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NpFvp-0004mo-LH@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6505


Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX




--- Comment #1 from Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>  2010-03-10 07:02:12 ---
see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jan/0638.html

"If the purpose of this draft is just to give readers information on the 
elements and attributes and not actually give them detailed information on 
the full implications of those same, then how relative URLs are resolved 
is probably information that can be omitted."

Agreed, so not adding that information.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 07:02:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 March 2010 07:02:16 GMT